Sunday, June 18, 2000

 

Golden Boy Reduced To Mortal
----------------------------

Look, I like Oscar De La Hoya. I think he's a good
guy and I'd trade my looks for his in a New York
minute. But can we please stop the hype.

Oscar De La Hoya is a good fighter. That's all.
June 17, the whole world saw what happens when the
publicity machine goes a little too far.

The way NBC used to toot the Lakers horn before got
to town. After 3 years they stopped that because they
couldn't get anywhere close to the Finals. NBC was
evenhanded this season because the Lakers didn't look
very good on paper. All of a sudden, Bam! the Lakers
break out with a great team.

Where am I going with this? I'm trying to tell you
that we build up teams and athletes way too much. How
many of you knew a lot about Sugar Shane Mosley before
he beat Oscar on a split decision Saturday June 17th
in Los Angeles? Not much.

You probably didn't know he was the 1998 Fighter of
the Year and his father, Jack, was the Trainer of the
Year also.

Don't feel bad, the so called experts picked De La
Hoya too. Wally Mathews of the New York Post said
Mosley couldn't outjab The Golden Boy and win. Well,
Wally Sugar Shane landed at a 42% clip to Oscars's 36%
in the punch department.

Legenary trainer, Teddy Atlas, felt Sugar Shane
would get knocked out because of his lack of
experience and recent move up to 147.

Sugar Ray Leonard said Oscar would win because of
his height and experience in major bouts. Sugar put
his words on the wrong guy.

Shane Mosely worked Oscar De La Hoya over because he
was the better fighter. He was the better fighter
before the two men entered the ring. This just in,
every great fighter isn't on HBO for all of their
fights.

Just a few months ago I drove out to a California
Indian reservation to see Mosley's first fight in the
welterweight division. A knockout over Wilfredo
Riveria. A fighter De La Hoya defeated on a TKO.

Boxing is politics and the great breaks of come The
Golden Boy's way.

The split decision Mosley won shouldn't have been
that. Mosley won on Lou Filipo's card 116-112, Pat
Russell had it 115-113 for Mosley, and Marty Sammon
called it 115-113 for De La Hoya. I had Sugar winning
by 4 points on my card.

Somebody tell me what fight Sammon saw!! The Golden
Boy was taking Sugar Jabs to his face all night. When
Oscar tried to trade, Mosley gave it right back. The
4 inches in height De La Hoya had were worthless.
This fight should have been a unaminous decision.

The fight was great action. These two LA kids
traded blows and jabs all night. It was a treat to
see. Oscar didn't run, a la, Trinidad.

We will see a rematch this fall. Oscar's promoter
knew his Golden Ticket could get beat and already put
in the contract for an immediate rematch.

I want to hear Oscar's excuses now. Every fight he
says he's in the best shape of his life. Yet, after
close calls against Quartery, Trinidad and others, he
claimed not to be in shape.

His plan to take on four opponents and knock out
each one in 2000 is scrapped for now.

De La Hoya must find a way to pick up his game. The
pub machine can't save him now. He can't dispute this
loss as he did with Trinidad. He didn't run, but he
didn't win. That's why he gets paid big..to win.
Oscar has now lost his last 2 major fights. I don't
count that stiff he knocked out earlier this year.

At 32-2, what do we make of The Golden Boy now.
Fernando Vargas has long spoke negatively of the 1992
Olympic champs as, "No real Mexican fighter". Maybe
their is truth in that remark after all.

Sugar Shane Mosley is now 35-0 and holds the WBC
welterweight title. He beat Oscar when he was 12 and
now at 28. Oscar said he never remembered their
earlier fight. What's that old line, those who fail
to understand history are deemed to repeat it.
Something like that.

Oscar De La Hoya won't forget this loss. And the
Top Rank promotions team can't spin it either.



Read NewDawg.com's previous My Words:  2/28/2000 | 3/1/2000 | 3/7/2000 | 3/13/2000 | 3/17/2000 | 3/20/2000 | 4/3/2000 | 4/7/2000 | 4/12/2000 | 4/17/2000 | 4/18/2000 | 5/1/2000 | 5/2/2000 | 5/5/2000 | 5/7/2000 | 5/8/2000 | 5/21/2000 | 6/14/2000 | 6/15/2000 | 6/18/2000 | 6/19/2000 | 6/20/2000 | 6/22/2000 | 6/27/2000 | 6/28/2000 | 6/29/2000 | 7/3/2000 | 7/7/2000 | 7/10/2000 | 7/17/2000 | 7/18/2000 | 7/19/2000 | 7/20/2000 | 7/26/2000 | 7/27/2000 | 8/8/2000 | 8/14/2000 | 8/17/2000 | 9/5/2000 | 9/8/2000 | 9/12/2000 | 9/20/2000 | 10/20/2000 | 10/23/2000 | 10/25/2000 | 11/3/2000 | 11/6/2000 | 11/14/2000 | 11/15/2000 | 11/16/2000 | 12/5/2000 | 12/12/2000 | 12/13/2000 | 12/28/2000 | 1/3/2001 | 1/11/2001 | 1/19/2001 | 1/29/2001 | 2/7/2001 | 2/8/2001 | 2/12/2001 | 2/23/2001 | 3/6/2001 | 3/12/2001 | 3/21/2001 | 3/26/2001 | 4/2/2001 | 4/6/2001 | 4/30/2001 | 5/3/2001 | 8/27/2001 | 8/28/2001 | 8/29/2001 | 8/30/2001 | 9/6/2001 | 9/7/2001 | 9/14/2001 | 1/31/2002 | 6/24/2002 | 6/26/2002 | 6/27/2002 | 7/5/2002 | 7/10/2002 | 7/17/2002 | 8/11/2002 | 8/31/2002 | 9/8/2002 | 9/14/2002 | 9/24/2002 | 12/4/2002 | 12/6/2002 | 12/10/2002 | 12/13/2002 | 12/16/2002 | 12/31/2002 | 1/5/2003 | 1/6/2003 | 1/8/2003 | 1/20/2003 | 1/22/2003 | 1/27/2003 | 1/29/2003 | 2/6/2003 | 4/3/2003 | 4/9/2003 | 4/18/2003 | 4/26/2003 | 4/27/2003 | 5/4/2003 | 5/6/2003 | 5/7/2003 | 5/9/2003 | 5/11/2003 | 5/18/2003 | 5/19/2003 | 5/20/2003 | 5/24/2003 | 5/25/2003 | 5/28/2003 | 6/1/2003 | 6/3/2003 | 6/12/2003 | 6/13/2003 | 6/25/2003 | 6/27/2003 | 7/15/2003 | 7/20/2003 | 8/10/2003 | 8/16/2003 | 9/8/2003 | 9/21/2003 | 9/24/2003 | 11/15/2003 | 12/7/2003 | 12/26/2003 | 1/7/2004 | 2/1/2004 | 2/8/2004 | 2/11/2004 | 2/16/2004 | 2/19/2004 | 2/25/2004 | 3/1/2004 | 3/9/2004 | 3/14/2004 | 3/20/2004 | 3/24/2004 | 4/1/2004 | 4/6/2004 | 4/12/2004 | 4/17/2004 | 4/23/2004 | 4/25/2004 | 5/2/2004 | 5/8/2004 | 5/17/2004 | 5/22/2004 | 6/5/2004 | 6/25/2004 | 7/10/2004 | 7/11/2004 | 9/3/2004 | 9/10/2004 | 9/24/2004 | 9/25/2004 | 10/2/2004 | 10/12/2004 | 11/5/2004 | 11/19/2004 | 11/20/2004 | 12/5/2004 | 12/15/2004 | 1/14/2005 | 1/31/2005 | 2/11/2005 | 4/18/2005 | 4/24/2005 | 5/29/2005 | 7/10/2005 | 7/16/2005 | 7/26/2005 | 8/27/2005 | 9/2/2005 | 9/16/2005 | 9/20/2005 | 9/24/2005 | 10/7/2005 | 10/8/2005 | 10/15/2005 | 10/22/2005 | 10/30/2005 | 11/12/2005 | 11/19/2005 | 11/30/2005 | 12/9/2005 | 12/24/2005 | 12/30/2005 | 1/4/2006 | 1/12/2006 | 1/15/2006 | 2/4/2006 | 2/6/2006 | 2/9/2006 | 2/19/2006 | 3/5/2006 | 3/23/2006 | 3/29/2006 | 4/16/2006 | 4/28/2006 | 5/15/2006 | 6/26/2006 | 6/27/2006 | 7/3/2006 | 7/4/2006 | 7/6/2006 | 7/7/2006 | 7/9/2006 | 7/15/2006 | 7/16/2006 | 7/18/2006 | 7/27/2006 | 8/23/2006 | 8/25/2006 | 8/27/2006 | 9/1/2006 | 9/2/2006 | 9/5/2006 | 9/8/2006 | 9/9/2006 | 9/10/2006 | 9/14/2006 | 9/15/2006 | 9/17/2006 | 9/20/2006 | 9/23/2006 | 9/29/2006 | 9/30/2006 | 10/7/2006 | 10/15/2006 | 10/23/2006 | 10/27/2006 | 10/29/2006 | 10/30/2006 | 11/4/2006 | 11/11/2006 | 11/15/2006 | 11/19/2006 | 11/25/2006 | 12/9/2006 | 12/11/2006 | 12/14/2006 | 12/20/2006 | 12/22/2006 | 12/23/2006 | 12/25/2006 | 12/27/2006 | 12/28/2006 | 1/8/2007 | 1/14/2007 | 1/26/2007 | 1/28/2007 | 2/6/2007 | 2/17/2007 | 7/23/2007 | 7/25/2007 | 7/28/2007 | 8/1/2007 | 8/4/2007 | 8/17/2007 | 8/19/2007 | 8/25/2007 | 9/2/2007 | 9/13/2007 | 9/15/2007 | 9/23/2007 | 9/28/2007 | 9/29/2007 | 10/1/2007 | 10/19/2007 | 11/1/2007 | 11/3/2007 | 11/5/2007 | 11/30/2007 | 12/15/2007 | 1/2/2008 | 1/4/2008 | 1/6/2008 | 1/10/2008 | 1/14/2008 | 1/18/2008 | 1/19/2008 | 1/20/2008 | 2/26/2008 | 3/25/2008 | 3/29/2008 | 3/31/2008 | 4/11/2008 | 4/12/2008 | 4/17/2008 | 4/19/2008 | 4/28/2008 | 5/2/2008 | 5/3/2008 | 5/10/2008 | 5/24/2008 | 6/9/2008 | 6/15/2008 | 9/1/2008 | 9/20/2008 | 10/4/2008 | 10/24/2008 | 11/9/2008 | 12/9/2008 | 12/13/2008 | 12/20/2008 | 12/29/2008 | 1/19/2009 | 1/25/2009 | 2/1/2009 | 2/20/2009 | 2/28/2009 | 3/5/2009 | 3/29/2009 | 4/24/2009 | 6/26/2009 | 9/6/2009 | 10/4/2009 | 12/29/2009 | 4/10/2010 | 7/25/2010 |


 
| ABOUT NEWY | SPORT PAGES | ASK NEWY | DAWG BYTES | STORE | CALENDAR | DRAWING | PHOTOS | HOME |

©2008 NewDawg.com. All Rights Reserved. Email: info@newdawg.com